P4rLvSWSUE/hqdefault.jpg' alt='Watch The Throwaways HD 1080P' title='Watch The Throwaways HD 1080P' />If your microwave oven is not working properly, here are some troubleshooting tips. If the microwave will not turn on no power, this could mean a GFCI outlet. Lets take a look at some of the significant features found in both EOS 5Ds models Summary of Canon EOS 5Ds Features. Extreme 50. 6 Megapixel Full Frame CMOS Sensor. The Wrath of Khan Endures After 3. Years Trek. Movie. This weekend marks the 3. Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan, a film most still consider to be the best in the franchise. Trek. Movie had a chance to talk to director and uncredited screenwriter Nicholas Meyer about just why it has lasted the test of time, and more, including the latest 4. K UHD transfer of the movie. Nicholas Meyer having some fun with Ricardo Montalban on the set of  Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan. Why Wrath Of Khan was lightning in a bottle. We actually talked 1. Star Trek II. So with another decade to reflect, and you have worked on Star Trek again with Discovery. So now do you have a better idea why Wrath of Khan endures and is considered by most to still embody the best of Star Trek I am not sure I am very clever about this. It seems to me to be a case of lighting in a bottle, and Im not sure how it got there. Watch Bad Parents Tube Free there. I have said elsewhere that movies are like souffls, they either rise or they dont. And it is very hard for an amateur baker such as myself to explain why or why not that should be the case. It is miraculous and amazing to me that the movie has hit some kind of emotional sweet spot. I can account intellectually up to a certain point. I understand that it was very well put together. Watch War Of The Worlds Online Gorillavid. It was built to last. I like to think that the things I work on are conceived with an idea that they are going to last and endure at least over the short term. I am not referring to millennia, but the idea that they were at least well constructed and well thought out and so forth. I think that there is a certain balance that appeals to me enormously in certain works of art in which character and plot achieve a kind of balance where they are interlocked and interdependent and where one does not overpower the other. I think you can watch a play by Eugene ONeill that is all character and very little plot and you can go to certain comic books and find that it is all plot and no character. But somewhere there is a sweet spot. I was rewatching The Prisoner of Zenda, from 1. I thought it was a kind of perfect balance between character and plot. Maybe Hamlet is a perfect balance between character and plot. And maybe, and I dont claim this was deliberate or intentional on my part, The Wrath of Khan balances character and plot pretty inextricably. And maybe that is part of it, but I dont really know. You were brought in somewhat late in the process and you had a short deadline. The studio gave you mostly a free hand except where it came to coming in with a dramatically lower budget than the first Star Trek film. So you took over the script and I think you once described yourself in a good way as a dictator in getting it done. Do you feel the combination of fewer cooks and a freer hand is part of the reason it worked And could you imagine that working today in a franchise studio movie Well, I am not a businessman and I dont know about franchises and studio films and I tend not to patronize them, to be candid. I go to little movies about people who are trying to figure out their shit and that is what interests me. It is not that I wouldnt like to see those movies with bigger budgets and more bells and whistles, it is just that comic books dont interest me, the exploding car doesnt interest me, superheroes dont interest me. Movies whose last name ends in man that doesnt interest me. The business part doesnt interest me. I think art is a dictatorship. It is maybe government by the consent of the governed in the sense that you dont have to patronize it. You dont have to watch it. You dont have to read it or listen to it, but if you do it is going to have to be on the terms of the artist. So I think things are better that they are not done by committee. I wasnt brought in to The Wrath of Khan at the last minute, it should be understood. I was hired to direct the second movie and I was told that draft five of the script was imminent and I sat around waiting for that and then it was deemed to be not worth showing me and they were upset and they were under the gun because and I didnt know this either the movie had already been booked into theaters. When I was disappointed when they said they couldnt show me the drafts I said, Let me read it, let me read draft four, draft three and so forth. And that is how I evolved into the de facto writer of what became the finished script, which was cobbled together from scraps and bits and pieces oddments of the previous five drafts. And then all the dialog and thematic material added by me. It was only last minute in the sense that things didnt go the way they were supposed to. Nicholas Meyer on the set of Star Trek II with William Shatner. A big budget Wrath of Khan I dont know if you like to talk hypotheticals, but Im going to try one anyway. Lets say that Paramount gave you the same budget that Robert Wise had for The Motion Picture and even more time. How different of a film would you have made Would it have been less of an intimate tale, much of which is set on two stages, which were actually the same stage just redressed I think that art thrives on restrictions that is for sure. One of my all time favorite movies is the Laurence Olivier Henry V movie that was made in the midst of World War II with 7. And they took a leaf out of the play in which it was based in which Shakespeare basically says to use your imagination, On your imaginary forces work. And I think that art that leaves things to the imagination of the viewer or the audience or the reader tends to engage them more fully than art that leaves nothing to the imagination. We call that in the movie business eye candy. Everything is supplied by the filmmaker so the audience has nothing to do except to sit there and gape at images which are all amazing with no differentiation between an important or an unimportant image. I think if I had more money on Star Trek II the one thing that would have been better would have been the Genesis planet cave which was a cut rate situation. It wouldnt have taken a lot more money by the way to do what needed to be done. And again you prefaced this by saying this is a hypothetical, I dont know that Im that eager to spend money. I am much more eager to figure out ways to get audiences involved without assaulting them either visually or with huge noisy soundtracks. I have no objection to great visuals or a lot of noise, but neither is a steady diet. Nothing is a steady diet. Variety is the spice of life. The Genesis cave and the rather obvious matte. The difference between directing Shatner and directing Nimoy. One of your favorite stories to tell about directing the film was how you got William Shatner to give a more natural performance by sort of wearing him down with multiple takes, such as in the here it comes scene. Did he ever catch on to this trick during Khan or maybe with The Undiscovered CountryIf he caught on, he did not mention it. He did not allude to it. Another big difference between the first Trek film and Wrath of Khan was Leonard Nimoys Spock. It is more personal, more emotional if you will. Can you talk about how you and Leonard worked together on his performance Did you have any tricks for him like you did for Shatner I didnt have any tricks for Leonard. Leonard really understood the most revealing thing he said to me was, I never played Spock as an unemotional person, I always played him as someone who was intent on keeping his emotions in check. Under wraps. And I think this was a particularly subtle and telling distinction because it is more interesting to see an actor trying not revealing something than an actor attempting to kind of put it on display. Rather than seeing an actor crying but seen an actor trying not to cry is more interesting and more involving. Again it is about leaving things to the imagination and not laying it all out. And I think Leonard was very good at understanding this from the get go. I didnt really have to tell him much. Canon EOS 5. Ds Review. When the EOS 5. Ds was announced, Canon photographers around the world shouted a collective Yes and I want it. You are looking at a pair of world record holding DSLR cameras, the Canon EOS 5. Ds along with its near identical twin, the 5. Ds R. As of review time, these are the highest resolution 3. DSLR cameras ever produced. In the past, we have seen some reasonable upgrades in terms of megapixels, but. Canons next highest resolution models. T6i and T6s. Canon has been long rumored to be interested in entering the medium format market. Most, if not all, of those expectations were for a completely new, larger sensor format camera model with a new line of lenses delivering an image circle that covered the larger sensor. While I doubt that this rumor will completely die, it has certainly been fulfilled to at least a significant extent in the 5. Ds. The 5. Ds does not deliver the extremely shallow depth of field that a medium format camera produces. Ds offers medium format resolution in a much smaller footprint with a more capable feature set and compatibility with an extensive range of lenses and accessories. Did you ever dream of medium format resolution for your sports and wildlife photos This camera can do that. Take an EOS 5. D Mark III, install an extremely high resolution sensor, add some newer features found on the 7. Watch Sailor Moon Season 2. D II, add a few brand new features and you have an EOS 5. Ds and 5. Ds R. Canons 5 series lineup has been on a roughly 3 year upgrade cycle. The original Canon EOS 5. D DSLR was the first affordable full frame DSLR. It was a highly regarded and very successful model. The Canon EOS 5. D Mark II, with its excellent 2. MP full frame sensor, launched to instant success 3 years later. The image quality to price ratio of this model was exceptional and the 5. D II was the catalyst for the popularity of DSLR video today. About three and a half years after the 5. D IIs arrival, the Canon EOS 5. D Mark III was announced. While the 5. D III brought another image quality upgrade, the improvement, especially in resolution, was minimal relative to the improvement brought by version II. The 5. D III had many great upgraded features, but the standout was its amazing new AF system. The 5. Ds models take us back to the primary upgrade feature being a very significant resolution increase as we last saw with the 5. D II. A pair of 5. D Mark III cameras have been my go to work horses for the last three years. They are amazing cameras and I was not at all disappointed to learn that the 5. Ds, the ultra high resolution camera I have been asking for, shares a very significant number of 5. D III features including. It is especially convenient that all 5. D III accessories including batteries, battery grips, L brackets, etc. USB attached products need a replacement cable to accommodate the version 3. The inherited 7. D II features and other new features will be discussed throughout this review. There are two versions of the 5. Ds with the 5. Ds R being the other model. The only difference between the 5. Ds and the 5. Ds R is that the R incorporates an optical low pass filter effect cancellation, essentially negating the effects of the low pass filter. Chuck Westfall Canon USA explains the difference. The EOS 5. DS uses a conventional low pass filter design in which a single point of image data entering the filter is first separated into two points and ultimately into four points by the time the data reaches the image sensor. By comparison, the EOS 5. DS R uses a different low pass filter design in which the single point entering the filter is first separated into two points and then the two points are merged back into a. Using the optical cancellation technique vs. The R delivers sharper images, but moir and aliasing are potential side effects, notably in scenes that include patterns repeating at a specific frequency. Fortunately, Chuck expects this phenomenon to seldom occur and indicated that If it does, it can usually be mitigated during post processing. I directly compare these two cameras in the Canon EOS 5. Ds R review. What do the s and R stand for According to Chuck Westfall. As with sibling models sold by Canon in the past such as 1. D1. DS, the S was added to indicate a high resolution type. It means Super or Superior. As for R, the low pass filter effect is cancelled, and as it refers to an even higher resolution model, the initial for Resolution is used. The 5. D Mark III remains in the lineup as of review time and I provide a 5. Ds vs. 5. D III features comparison near the end of this review. Lets take a look at some of the significant features found in both EOS 5. Ds models. Summary of Canon EOS 5. Ds Features. Extreme 5. Megapixel Full Frame CMOS Sensor. Dual DIGIC 6 image processors. AF including 4. 1 cross type AF sensors, with EOS i. TR, AI Servo AF III, AF Configuration tool. RGBIR, 2. 52 zone metering sensor for improved precision. Zone, Spot and AF Point Expansion focusing modes. ISO 1. 00 6. 40. Magnesium alloy body, shutter durability rated up to 1. Clear View II LCD monitor approximately 1,0. Flicker Mode adjusts shutter release timing to avoid flickering light issues. Dual Memory Card Slots supporting one CF UDMA Mode 7 and one SDSDHCSDXC UHS I memory card. Mirror Vibration Control System to reduce mirror vibration blur. HDR shooting in camera. Short 5. 9ms shutter lag. Upgraded Transparent LCD viewfinder with 1. Dual Axis Electronic Level with dedicated viewfinder display. In camera Multiple Exposure and HDR modes. Customizable Quick Control screen 5 stops of exposure compensation. Peripheral Illumination and Chromatic Aberration Lens Correction in camera. EOS Integrated Cleaning System EICSWeather resistance. Improved custom controls with built in Intervalometer and bulb timer. Time lapse Movie function. Super Speed USB 3. Sensor and Image Quality. The headline feature for this camera is unquestionably the 5. MP full frame CMOS sensor, designed and produced completely by Canon according to Chuck Westfall. The sensor uses optimised gap less microlenses with a reduced distance to the photodiode to improve the light gathering efficiency. CPN. Here is a chart comparing some current and recent EOS camera models. Nothing comes close to the 5. Ds resolution. Also notable is that, for the first time, a full frame Canon EOS DSLR has a pixel density nearly as high as or higher than the highest resolution APS C sensors. With a pixel pitch that essentially matches the EOS sensor densities found in the 7. D and 7. D Mark II, the 5. Ds effectively erases the reach advantage formerly always held by APS C DSLRs. Yes, the announced at the same time Rebel T6i and T6s have slightly higher density sensors 3. No longer is the 7. D Mark IIs pixel density an advantage for reach reasons or for angle of view reasons. If you want an APS C cameras 1. Ds 1. 6x center crop mode with 1. Prefer the old 1. D 1. 3x framing No problem as that crop mode is also available with 3. Especially nice is the viewfinder provided crop lines mask or outline for these two crop modes. In addition to the 2 3 native aspect ratio, images can be captured in 1 1 think Instagram, 4 3 and 1. Ideally, cropping is done during post processing, and with this extreme resolution, extensive cropping is possible with a still high resolution image potentially remaining. I often find myself using the entire image dimensions to frame the final composition I am seeking, attempting to have the most detail for viewing or printing large. While this strategy is usually a good one, sometimes that tight framing gets me in trouble later such as when I need a bleed edge or need to format the image to a non 3 2 ratio such as for an 8x. With this much resolution available, I am trying to allow myself the freedom to frame slightly looser at least sometimes to better accommodate those needs.